Kansas City Divorce Lawyer & Attorney : Wortman Law Firm

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The Issue of attorney's fees often comes up in domestic litigation.  Missouri has adopted the American Rule regarding attorney's fees in that, absent statutory authorization or contractual agreemtn, each litigant, absent few exceptions, must bear the expense of their own attorney's feesl  However, Missouri's dissolution of marriage law allows the court to order one party to pay the other's attorney's fees, but the court must consider all relevant factors including the financial resources of both parties, the merits of the case, and the actions of the parties during the action.  The inability of one spouse to pay his or her own or the other party's attorney's fees is not determinitive.  Some examples supporting an award of fees would include unfounded allegations of child abuse, concealing assets, abuse of discovery, and failure to appear for trial. 

Recent Case
The Party seeking an award of attorney fees has the burden of proof to show that an award of attorneys fees is appropriate.  In the recent case cited below,  the record contains some evidence of father's financial resources—retirement and disability—but none on Mother's financial resources or on "any unusual circumstances warranting departure from Missouri's adoption of the American rule requiring each litigant to bear their own expenses." Circuit Court abused its discretion in awarding fees. Reversed.
Tina Marie Hihn, Respondent, v. Joseph Alexander Hihn, Appellant. Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Discussed below is a recent ruling from the Western District of Missouri, where the Court, among other things, upheld the trial Court's ruling of imputation of income for child support and the award of attorney's fees. 

For calculation of child support, a trial court may impute income to a party according to what that party could earn by using best efforts to gain employment suitable to his or her capabilities.   Imputation is appropriate where the parent voluntarily reduces his or her income without justification. Further, Imputation is only proper where the trial court concludes from the evidence that the "parent has the capacity to earn more but voluntarily refuses to do so."  In imputing income, the directions to Form 14 indicate that the court may consider employment potential and probable earnings level based on the parent's recent work history, occupational qualifications, prevailing job opportunities in the community. 

As to the issue of attorneys fees, Missouri law permits the Court to award attorney's fees to a party, but it is not required to do so.  Generally the Court takes the position that each party must bear their own costs of litigation, and usually does not require one party to pay the attorney's fees of another party.  However, if the court does make such an award, the Court must consider all relevant factors including, the relative financial resources of the parties, the merits of the case, and the actions of the parties during the pendancy of the action.  In this recent case, the Court of Appeals stated in so many words that an award of attorney's fees would not be reversed if the award was arbitrary and unreasonable.

The summary of the case is as follows:

Circuit Court Need Not Award All Attorney Fees
Child's best interest does not necessarily require that Spouse who was caregiver during marriage has more parenting time after dissolution. Circuit Court properly imputed income to Spouse based on evidence of earning potential and desire not to achieve it. Actual income includes bonuses and benefits. In property division, Circuit Court need not credit Spouse with separate debts, including attorney fees, and need not award fees where much was spent litigating meritless issue. Payment of past maintenance did not waive contest of future payments, but Spouse did not show that the amount "was unwarranted, beyond [Spouse's] means to pay or so excessive as to constitute an abuse of . . . discretion. Rule allows award of half of transcript costs.
Sharlene Krepps, Appellant-Respondent, v. Richard Lee Krepps, Respondent-Appellant. Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

One very important, and often overlooked, factor to consider as part of your dissolution of marriage is a re-evaluation, (or first evaluation as is often the case) of your estate plan.   If there is no plan in place, the laws that will determine how your estate will be divided upon your death change significantly when you are divorced.  If there is a plan in place, you will most certainly want to make changes for your future to match the changes in your life today.  Below are some very basic points on estate planning from about.com:

If you have assets, no matter what your age, marital status, or financial wealth, you should plan your estate in the event of your death or incapacitation. If you should die without a sound estate plan, someone will be exposed to additional grief and expense. If you become incapacitated, your bills might not get paid. You could also be put on life support which is OK unless you have strong feelings about your life being prolonged artificially if you have no chance for recovery. A little preparation and maintenance could make this difficult time less taxing for those you love and who love you.

There are many reasons to have a sound estate plan but here are eight I feel are most important. If you should die or become incapacitated, a sound estate plan could:

1. save your family thousands of dollars
2. distribute your assets to those of your choosing, not of the government's choosing
3. designate who will raise your minor children
4. make sure someone is authorized to pay your bills
5. avoid conflicts among your family members
6. make sure your assets aren’t divided among your children’s ex-spouses
7. keep your children from frivolously spending the inheritance
8. prevent death taxes.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The following article has recently appeared on at least a few of the family law blogs, which I found to be particularly interesting.  Thanks to the Oklahoma Family Law Blog and the Georgia Family Law Blog for sharing this information with us.

Marriage has become a delicate venture. According to the U.S. Census bureau, about nine out of ten people will marry sometime in their lives, but about half of first marriages will end in divorce. And while some marriages end peacefully, with both sides agreeing to an equal and fair settlement, some do not, and the ensuing process can get quite vicious.

When ex-spouses significantly distrust each other, it is advisable to engage the services of a lawyer, especially if one or both do not understand their household finances and the economic implications of marital settlements. In turn, attorneys often hire CPAs as forensic accountants to help represent the spouse who doesn’t have access to the family’s financial information. In these cases, the forensic analysis might include reviewing financial data to determine its accuracy and reasonableness; determining each spouse’s standard of living and disposable income; locating hidden assets; and determining what property may be considered separate from marital property, especially if one of the spouses runs a closely held business. This type of work has created a highly focused segment for the profession: forensic accounting in divorce engagements.

Marriage: The Leading Cause of Divorce? Out of the more than 2 million marriages performed last year, 60% were the first marriage for both bride and groom. Unfortunately, for those first marriages that do end in divorce, the average length of a first marriage is only about eight years. The median duration of second marriages that end in divorce is only about seven years.       

Most newlyweds probably don’t think of their wedding day as the beginning of a personal business partnership: making money, budgeting, accumulating assets, and investing for the future. Nevertheless, couples should still plan how to divide this property at the blissful beginning, not the bitter end. This planning could take the form of a premarital agreement, which may not be a perfect document, but is generally enforceable in all 50 states. This is why both spouses must understand their household’s finances. It is not a good idea to allow one spouse to run all the finances while the other spouse knows nothing about it. After all, the person you plan to spend the rest of your life with would never try to hide something from you … or would they?

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Considering the fact that financial issues are a significant cause of stress on the family, I thought the following article, recently published at msnbc.com provided some very useful information.  It is republished below:

Most Americans have no emergency savings, a new survey shows. The findings are consistent with a host of other surveys and government data that chronicle Americans' abysmal savings rate and, more important, our lack of preparedness for life's unexpected events.

Released Monday at a press conference designed to call attention to "America Saves Week," the survey by the Consumer Federation of America and other consumer agencies indicates that only 40 percent of adult Americans maintain separate emergency savings accounts. And about one-third of those savers have set aside less than $2,000 for that inevitable rainy day.

Even $2,000 is considerably less than the 3- to 6-months of living expenses that most personal finance advocates recommend as an emergency kitty. Coincidentally, it is exactly the amount Hurricane Katrina victims received in "expedited assistance" aid from the federal government in the days after the storm. Thousands of victims didn't get the benefits because of computer glitches and other technicalities, and many of them were left with nearly no means of support after their homes and jobs were washed out by the storm. The Katrina aftermath shined a harsh light on the financial preparedness of many American consumers.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Bankruptcy treats debts that were incurred in the course of a divorce or legal separation differently than run of the mill third party debts. The most common kinds of debts incurred during divorce are 1) the obligation of one spouse to pay the other a sum of money in connection with division of the marital property; and 2) the obligation to protect the other spouse from the debts to third parties awarded to the debtor for payment.

Section 523(a)(15) of the Bankruptcy Code makes debts incurred in divorce non dischargeable in Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 cases. Gone, in the amended bankruptcy code, is the provision that called for a weighing of the hardships that discharge might impose on the non debtor spouse. Such debts are now flat-out non dischargeable.

The distinction to be noted is that the debtor can discharge the obligation to Big Credit Card Company, awarded to him for payment in the divorce, but he can’t discharge his obligation to his ex to hold her harmless should Big Credit Card Company sue her for the debt.

In Chapter 13, however, those debts are dischargeable, without debate.

In every chapter in the bankruptcy code, spousal support, alimony and child support are non dischargeable.

Source for Post: Bankruptcy Law Network and Moran Law Group

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The Kansas Family Law Blog had a great posting recently about the deductibility of attorney's fees, which I have set forth below.  For more information on this issue, see the tax archives of this blog

It’s that time of year again. Of course, the general rule is that lawyers’ fees and costs in connection with obtaining a divorce are not tax deductible. As with many general rules, there are exceptions:

1. Attorneys’ fees related to tax advice. I.R.C. §212(3). Areas having tax implications upon which an attorney may offer advice include the tax effect of the distribution of property, including retirement plans, tax deductibility of interest payments or installments to effectuate an equitable distribution of property, the allocation of the dependency exemption and child tax credit, whether a joint tax return should be filed, the tax effect of unallocated maintenance and child support, the tax implications of the form of alimony, and advice regarding the recapture of front end loaded maintenance in the first three years following separation.

Practice tip: it is not helpful for the client wishing to tax deduct some attorney fees to have a provision in the marital settlement agreement that no tax advice was given.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The following are some infomative and useful tips on the sale of a residence in divorce from divorcehq.com

For many people going through a divorce their biggest asset is their home or in legal speak, the marital residence. Deciding what to do about the marital residence is often a major issue in a divorce. There are a few different options when it comes to splitting the marital residence.

One option is for one spouse to keep the house and buy out the other spouse's share. Another option is for one spouse to be granted exclusive use for a specified period of time, usually when the youngest child turns 18, after which the house will be sold. Finally, the house can be sold outright with the profits being allocated to each spouse.

Should you sell your house? Hard as it may be this is a decision that needs to be made devoid of emotions. As a practical matter take into consideration whether or not it is financially beneficial to keep the home. If not and you do decide to sell here are a few tips to help you through the process.

Time is money: Put your home on the market as far in advance as possible of purchasing a new one. Remember that when people buy and sell a home there usually is a domino effect. Closing and moving dates have to be coordinated, and the more firmly everyone commits to a window of dates and sticks to them, the better for all involved. Put all agreements about dates in writing, and protect yourself by negotiating financial penalties for failure to live up to the agreement.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Separation Agreement gave Amway distributorship to Wife for monthly payments to Husband. That payment was considered support because nothing else provided maintenance, the payment was in installments, it was subject to modification based on Amway profits, and it terminated on death of Husband. Trial Court erred in characterizing Wife's debt to Husband as a property settlement, dischargeable in bankruptcy, rather than nondischargeable support.

Author’s caveat: This case was decided under the bankruptcy law as it was before October 17, 2005. Under the new bankruptcy law, all domestic support obligations, which include alimony, child support, and property division, are generally non-dischargeable in bankruptcy.

To read further: Alticor, Inc., and Quixtar, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Harold W. Grissum, Defendant-Appellant, and Joyce C. Soldi, Defendant-Respondent. Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District

Source for Post:  The Missouri Bar

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

QUESTION:

My fiancée has asked about putting her name on the deed to my house after we get married. I don't want to do that in case things don't work out and we divorce. But I've heard that when I marry all of my assets automatically become half hers, anyway. I should say that I will be the only one paying for the mortgage and home improvements. What does the law say, and will a premarital agreement remedy the situation?

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Learn about tax breaks available to most parents.

New parents often find themselves overwhelmed by the expenses that come with a baby. From nursery furnishings to "onesies" to countless diapers, your little bundle of joy is going to cost you, well, a bundle. Fortunately, the federal government offers a number of tax breaks to offset the cost of raising a child. Here you'll learn about two tax breaks for which most parents qualify: the dependent exemption and the child tax credit.

The Dependent Exemption

You might be surprised to learn that the IRS does not tax every single dollar that you earn. Instead, the IRS gives you a very modest tax exemption ($3,200 per person in 2005) to cover your basic living expenses. Single people can take one exemption for themselves. Married couples can take two exemptions (one for each of them).

When you add a new child to your family, you can add one more exemption to your income taxes -- called a "dependent exemption." This means that you get an additional tax deduction of more than $3,000 every year until your child turns 19 -- a nice baby gift from Uncle Sam!

In terms of actual tax savings, the amount you save with the dependent exemption depends on your tax bracket. The higher your tax bracket, the more savings you get -- unless your income is so high that you cannot claim the exemption at all (see below). For example, if you were in the 10% tax bracket, you would save about $320 per child with the dependent exemption in 2005. But if you were in the 25% tax bracket, the dependent exemption would save you $800 per child.

Like many tax breaks, however, the dependent exemption is phased out for higher earning families. For the 2004 tax year, for example, married couples filing jointly could not claim the dependent exemption at all if their adjusted gross income was more than $336,550, and they lost a portion of their dependent exemption if their adjusted gross income exceeded $214,050.

If you qualify for the dependent exemption, claiming it on your tax return is easy. Simply complete line 6C of Form 1040 or Form 1040A, making sure to provide a Social Security number or Adoption Taxpayer Identification Number for your child in column 2. (See Social Security Numbers and Why Your Baby Needs One.) Also be certain to complete line 41 of your Form 1040 or line 26 of your Form 1040A.

The Child Tax Credit

The dependent exemption is not the only tax break that parents can claim. Provided that your income is below a certain limit ($130,000 for married couples filing jointly in 2004), you can also claim the child tax credit. The child tax credit trims your tax bill by $1,000 per child. Because it is a credit, and not a deduction, the child tax credit gives you $1,000 back in your pocket for every child that you have.

To determine the amount of the child tax credit you can claim, complete the child tax credit worksheet contained in IRS Publication 972, Child Tax Credit. (You can download this publication for free from the IRS website at www.irs.gov.) Then enter the amount of your child tax credit on your tax return (line 51 of Form 1040 or line 33 of Form 1040A). Also complete line 6C of Form 1040 or Form 1040A and provide a Social Security number or Adoption Taxpayer Identification Number for each child. Finally, check the box in column 4 of line 6c for each child for whom you are claiming the child tax credit.

Copyright © 2005 Nolo

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks